John Law

Some information about me

Profile

  • Picture of John Law

     

                                                                    

                                                 

                                                                                               

    "When they have stopped you writing, they have won."

                             L.J. Williams, Economic Historian and Sociologist

                                                 


    I joined CRESC and Open University Sociology in April 2010, I am a CRESC Centre Director, and co-convene the Social Life of Method (SLOM) research theme with Evelyn Ruppert.

    My research approach

    Four main points

    First, I’m interdisciplinary. Part sociologist and part from STS (science, technology and society), I’ve worked with sociologists, philosophers, engineers, medical practitioners, geographers and students of STS. The world is interdisciplinary, and it demands an interdisciplinary approach of the kind being developed in CRESC.

    Second, I assume that the world is materially heterogeneous, a mix of the social, economic, material, human, ‘natural’, and technical. We need rigorous ways of thinking and studying these heterogeneous processes. That’s why I’ve worked with actor-network theory and its successor ‘material-semiotic’ projects. ANT isn’t the only way of thinking about heterogeneity. Different approaches are needed, and this is another CRESC strength. But, suitably modulated, material-semiotics is a useful toolkit (certainly not a theory!) for catching some of the important processes of social life.

    Third, I assume that the world is discursively heterogeneous. I’m fascinated and horrified by the exclusions of the social. Systems both depend on and Other the people, collectivities and realities that fail to fit. If there’s an enemy here in addition to injustice then it is hubris. This means that in my research I go looking for gaps, aporias, and subaltern realities. Parts of my work draw on postcolonial sensibilities to imagine alternative knowledge spaces.

    Finally, I’m concerned with the performativity of method. In different ways CRESC members are exploring the character of research methods in domains ranging from financialisation, to the digital modelling of cities, and the remaking of social science methods. There’s a performative argument here. This is that methods tend to produce – though often in unanticipated and contradictory ways – the worlds they claim to be describing. This is why I’m so excited about the CRESC ‘social life of method’ SLOM theme. This will be an opportunity to debate methods and the social in a wide-ranging interdisciplinary forum. I’m hoping that STS work will add to this conversation.

    Collaborations

    I’m lucky enough to work closely with colleagues in a range of disciplines and locations. People I’ve worked with in the recent past include: Michel Callon (Paris CSI), Marianne Lien (Oslo), Wen-yuan Lin (Hsinchu, Taiwan), Annemarie Mol (Amsterdam), Ingunn Moser (Oslo), Vicky Singleton (Lancaster), John Urry (Lancaster), and Helen Verran (Melbourne). I'm now working with Karel Williams and Evelyn Ruppert within CRESC, and Mike Savage (York).

    Non-coherent method

    If the world is non-coherent, then what are the methods we need to know it, to enact it, and to live well in it? This is my core question in a continuing series of substantive projects.

    People, technologies and animals

    With anthropologists Marianne Lien and Gro Ween (University of Oslo) I’m working ethnographically on salmon farming on a project called ‘Newcomers to the Farm’. How do animals and people interact? How are those interactions mediated by technologies? How are human beings and animals being remade? These are our core questions. For more details click here.

    Biosecurity, agriculture and disaster

    I continue to work on foot and mouth disease, and the UK response to the disease outbreak of 2001. What are the vulnerabilities of agricultural systems? And how can and such complex and (in the end) ramshackle systems be understood and controlled? These are my key questions.

    Alternative knowledge spaces

    This is work with Wen-yuan Lin (Tsing-hua University, Taiwan), with Helen Verran (Melbourne), with scholars at Memorial University, Newfoundland, and within CRESC anthropology. What are the alternatives to systems of hegemonic knowledge? And how can we detect the Othering that goes with hegemony? These are the central questions.

    Interested in a PhD?

    If you think you might be interested in working with me please get in touch by contacting Karen Ho at CRESC OU.

    Links

    Personal web page

Publications

Refereed Journal Papers

Book Chapters

Projects

Social life of methods

  • In ‘the challenge of the digital’ we explore how social science methods and research are being challenged and reconfigured by developments in the collection, storage, networking,...

  • In this project we ask

    • How have social habits, identities, attitudes, opinions and feelings been historically constructed through devices such as the census, surveys, polls, market...
  • If the world is non-coherent, then what are the methods we need to know it, to enact it, and to live well in it? This is a core question in...

Topologies of Social Change

Blog

  • Two years ago the FT ran a big series called 'The Future of Capitalism'. Now its running a series of articles under the more apocalyptic rubric of  'Capitalism in Crisis'. Since Christmas there have been more or less weighty contributions by a series of more or less substantial contributors including such FT regulars as Phillip Stevens, Andrew Hill and Martin Wolf, with guest spots by the great and the good including such luminaries as Ed  Miliband, Jeffrey Sachs...

  • Interesting, isn't it, how drawing gets itself marginalised. Andrew Hill makes the point nicely.

    But perhaps it is that social scientists trade in words too much. Perhaps they tend to exclude drawings. I make this suggestion because engineers and scientists endlessly draw, sketch, and draft, when they are talking. There seems to be an essential visual component to such shop talk. Indeed, they joke about drawing on tablecloths in cafes over lunch (paper cloths are better than...

  • Here’s the conundrum: when do we actually make decisions? And when do we not? Did you decide to brush your teeth this morning? Or did it just happen?

    Speaking for myself, I sometimes make decisions. Sometimes I don’t make decisions, and I ought to. ‘Come on’, they say, ‘make up your mind.’ But most of the time I find that life is more like brushing your teeth. It happens. Things unfold. They go on. Decisions don’t seem to be relevant to it one way or the other. So what to...

  • How well – or badly – do academics write?

    In today’s Observer Nick Cohen says that we write pretty badly. In particular, we mostly fail to write in ways that communicate well with non-academic citizens. And this, he says, is crucially important at a moment when the government has removed state support from university social science and humanities courses in the UK. “...

  • I've been scanning the reports of the Wikileaks in The Guardian since they started. Some I read, some I look at, but most I simply ignore. Selectivity seems to be an inevitable response in the face of the so-called 'data deluge'.

    The Guardian's stories are just that: stories. It's a cliche, but visualisations are stories too. But what kinds of stories? Joseph Minard's graph of the the...

  • Welcome to CRESC's new web. We hope you like it! It's designed to reflect the second phase of CRESC, and our developing commitment to interdisciplinary and cross-cutting empirical and theoretical research. We've spent a lot of time and effort on the design, and on the content. What you'll see as you explore is the result of the efforts of a whole team of people both within and beyond CRESC.

    Outside CRESC we're grateful to our designer and developer, Jack Latimer, and...

Events

  • Mon, Jun 13th 2011 - Wed, Jun 15th 2011

    The baroque may be understood as a set of styles associated with the seventeenth and eighteenth century, or as a complaint about features of that large and diverse body of work. It may also be understood as a set of procedures or sensibilities that refuses representation and seeks to know, appreciate, trouble, and/or redeem the world allegorically. Informed by this last concern, this workshop will use empirical examples and case studies to explore what this might mean for practical research in the social sciences and the humanities.

  • Fri, Mar 30th 2012

    How have theories and methods formatted markets? How have they been moved from economics and STS? These questions will be explored by Michel Callon, Adam Leaver, Fabian Muniesa and Karel Wiliams from CRESC and the Ecole Nationale Superieure des Mines de Paris.